Presentation Event Entity Entity Process Occurrent Occurrent 2025-05-07T21:05:14 RDF description of Restorative materials repaired or replaced in Dental PBRN practices [presentation] - http://repository.healthpartners.com/individual/document-rn27295 document-rn27295 IADR (International Association for Dental Research) 89th General Session and Exhibition/AADR (American Association for Dental Research) 40th Annual Meeting/CADR (Canadian Association for Dental Research) 35th Annual Meeting Restorative materials repaired or replaced in Dental PBRN practices [presentation] 19488 Dental Care presentation 33236 Cross-Sectional Studies <p>Objective: The study aim was to identify the materials used to repair or replace failed restorations in Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN; www.DentalPBRN.org) practices and to determine which materials are more strongly associated with the decision to repair or replace. Methods: This cross-sectional study used a consecutive patient/restoration recruitment design. DBPRN practitioner-investigators recorded data for 50 or more restorations that needed repair or replacement on permanent tooth surfaces. DPBRN is a consortium of participating practices and dental organizations mainly from five regions: Alabama/Mississippi; Florida/Georgia; dentists employed by ΏͺΤΖΜεΣύ and private practitioners in Minnesota; Permanente Dental Associates in cooperation with Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research; and Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden). <br>Results: Data about the material in the existing restoration repaired or replaced were available from 8,431 restorations in 4,726 patients treated by 163 practitioner-investigators. Amalgam was the most common material present in defective restorations (AM=55%, n=4553), followed by direct resin-based composite (DRBC=35%, n= 2887). Less-common materials were metal ceramic (MC=5%, n=389), gold (GD=2%, n=187), glass ionomer (GI=2%, n=154), porcelain/ceramic (PC=1%, n=82), and indirect resin-based composite (IRBC< 1%, n=16). When multiple materials were present in the existing restoration, they were classified based on the material with the highest likelihood of failure (e.g., AM-GD was classified as AM). The existing material differed significantly as to whether the restoration was repaired or replaced (p=.001). GD (51%), PC (42%), MC (34%), and DRBC (30%) restorations were the most likely to be repaired instead of replaced, whereas GI (25%), AM (19%) and IRBC (19%) restoration were the least likely to be repaired instead of replaced entirely. <br>Conclusion: The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration was associated with the restorative material that was present in the existing restoration.<p> 2022-02-21T22:48:57.408-06:00 public